The Argument That The Literal Story Of Genesis Can Qualify As Science Collapses On Three Major Ground

HomeFortune CookiesMiscellaneous Collections

The argument that the literal story of Genesis can qualify as science
collapses on three major grounds: the creationists' need to invoke
miracles in order to compress the events of the earth's history into
the biblical span of a few thousand years; their unwillingness to
abandon claims clearly disproved, including the assertion that all
fossils are products of Noah's flood; and their reliance upon distortion,
misquote, half-quote, and citation out of context to characterize the
ideas of their opponents.
-- Stephen Jay Gould, The Verdict on Creationism,
The Skeptical Inquirer, Winter 87/88, pg. 186

Related: