Rimmer: Kry-ten! Assuming, assuming of course we're not dealing with five
dimensional objects in a basically Euclidean geometric universe,
and given the essential premis that all geomathematics is based on
the hideously limiting notion of one plus one equals two, and as
Asterman correctly postulated one and two are the same thing
observed from different precepts: I feel that the universe as
described by by Sites must therefore be a poly-dry-doc-decahohedron
hexa-hexa-hedro-attacon a-di-dibolic-hedra-hedron. Everything
else is poppycock, isn't that so?
Lister: Rimmer?
